<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Social Computing Lab : HP Labs : Latest Results</title>
<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/</link>
<description>Recent papers from HP Labs' Social Computing Lab</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:31:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
 <title>Artificial Inflation: The Real Story of Trends in Sina Weibo</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/chinatrends/weibospam.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>Top Trends on Sina Weibo influenced by spam</minidescription>
 <description>There has been a tremendous rise in the growth of online social networks all over the world in recent years.
This has facilitated users to generate a large amount of real-time content at an incessant rate, all competing
with each other to attract enough attention and become trends. While Western online social networks such
as Twitter have been well studied, characteristics of the popular Chinese microblogging network Sina Weibo
has not been. In this paper, we analyze in detail the temporal aspect of trends and trend-setters in
Sina Weibo, constrasting it with earlier observations on Twitter. One of our key findings is that a large percentage of trends in Sina Weibo are due to the continuous retweets of a small
amount of fraudulent accounts. These fake accounts are set up to artificially inflate certain posts causing them
to shoot up into Sina Weibo's trending list.</description>
 <author>Louis Yu, Sitaram Asur and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>20 Jan 2011 14:57:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>social media</tag>
  <tag>Sina Weibo</tag>
  <tag>trends</tag>
 </tags>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Pulse of News on Social Media: Forecasting Popularity</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/newsprediction/pulse.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>Predicting the spread of news in social media</minidescription>
 <description>News articles are extremely time sensitive by nature. There is also intense competition among news items to
propagate as widely as possible. Hence, the task of predicting the popularity of news items on the social web is both interesting and challenging. Prior research has
dealt with predicting eventual online popularity based on early popularity. It is most desirable, however, to
predict the popularity of items prior to their release, fostering the possibility of appropriate decision making
to modify an article and the manner of its publication. In this paper, we construct a multi-dimensional
feature space derived from properties of an article and evaluate the efficacy of these features to serve as predictors
of online popularity. We examine both regression and classification algorithms and demonstrate that despite
randomness in human behavior, it is possible to predict ranges of popularity on twitter with an overall
84% accuracy. Our study also serves to illustrate the differences between traditionally prominent sources and
those immensely popular on the social web.</description>
 <author>Roja Bandari, Sitaram Asur and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>20 Dec 2011 14:37:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>social media</tag>
  <tag>news</tag>
  <tag>popularity</tag>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>twitter</tag>
 </tags>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Long Trend Dynamics in Social Media</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/trenddynamics/dynamics.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>What makes a trend long lasting?</minidescription>
 <description>A main characteristic of social media is that its diverse content, copiously generated by both standard outlets and general users, constantly competes for the scarce attention of large audiences. Out of this flood of information some topics manage to get enough attention to become the most popular ones and thus to be prominently displayed as trends. Equally important, some of these trends persist long enough so as to shape part of the social agenda. How this happens is the focus of this paper. By introducing a stochastic dynamical model that takes into account the user's repeated involvement with given topics, we can predict the distribution of trend durations as well as the thresholds in popularity that lead to their emergence within social media. Detailed measurements of datasets from Twitter confirm the validity of the model and its predictions.</description>
 <author>Chunyan Wang and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>20 Dec 2011 14:37:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>social media</tag>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>trends</tag>
 </tags>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Collective Attention and the Dynamics of Group Deals</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/groupon/groupon.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>Predicting purchasing behavior for daily deals</minidescription>
 <description>We present a study of the group purchasing behavior of daily deals in Groupon and LivingSocial and introduce a predictive dynamic model of collective attention for group buying behavior. In our model, the aggregate number of purchases at a given time comprises two types of processes: random discovery and social propagation. We find that these processes are very clearly separated by an inflection point. Using large data sets from both Groupon and LivingSocial we show how the model is able to predict the success of group deals as a function of time. We find that Groupon deals are easier to predict accurately earlier in the deal lifecycle than LivingSocial deals due to the final number of deal purchases saturating quicker. One possible explanation for this is that the incentive to socially propagate a deal is based on an individual threshold in LivingSocial whereas it is based on a collective threshold, which for the most part is reached very early on in Groupon. Furthermore, the personal benefit  of propagating a deal is also greater in LivingSocial.</description>
 <author>Mao Ye, Chunyan Wang, Christina Aperjis, Bernardo A. Huberman, and Thomas Sandholm</author>
 <pubDate>26 Oct 2011 10:39:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>social computing</tag>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>temporal patterns</tag>
 </tags>
</item>

<item>
 <title>Swayed by Friends or by the Crowd?</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/swayed/swayed.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>How we make decisions under the influence of others</minidescription>
 <description>We conducted three empirical studies of the effects of friend recommendations and general ratings on how online users make choices. These two components of social influence were investigated through user studies on Mechanical Turk. We find that for a user deciding between two choices an additional rating star has a much larger effect than an additional friend's recommendation on the probability of selecting an item. Equally important, negative opinions from friends are more influential than positive opinions, and people exhibit more random behavior in their choices when the decision involves less cost and risk. Our results can be generalized across different demographics, implying that individuals trade off recommendations from friends and ratings in a similar fashion.                            </description>
 <author>Zeinab Abbasi, Christina Aperjis and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>27 Sep 2011 14:03:16 -0700</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>recommender systems</tag>
  <tag>online influence</tag>
  <tag>social computing</tag>
 </tags>
</item>

<item>
 <title>Understanding Social  Influence in Recommender Systems </title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/socialinfluence/SocialInfluence.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>How often do people change their minds because of others?</minidescription>
 <description>To investigate whether online recommendations can sway peoples' own opinions, we designed and ran an experiment to test how often people's choices are reversed by others' preferences when facing different levels of confirmation and conformity pressures. In our experiment participants were first asked to provide their preferences between pairs of items. They were then asked to make second choices about the same pairs with knowledge of others' preferences. To measure the pressure to confirm people's own opinions, we manipulated the time before the participants needed to make their second decisions. And to determine the effects of social pressure we manipulated the ratio of opposing opinions that the participants saw when making the second decision. Additionally, we tested whether other factors (i.e. age, gender and decision time) affect the tendency to revert.  Our results show that others people's opinions significantly sway people's own choices. The influence is stronger when people are required to make their second decision sometime later (22.4%) than immediately (14.1%). Moreover, people are most likely to reverse their choices when facing a moderate number of opposing opinions. Finally, the time people spend making the first decision significantly predicts whether they will reverse their decisions later on, while demographics such as age and gender do not. </description>
 <author>Haiyi Zhu, Bernardo A. Huberman, Yarun Luon</author>
 <pubDate>24 Aug 2011 13:18:55 -0700</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>social influence</tag>
  <tag>rankr</tag>
  <tag>recommender systems</tag>
  <tag>recommendations</tag>
  <tag>social computing</tag>
 </tags>
</item>


<item>
 <title>What Trends in Chinese Social Media</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/chinatrends/china_trends.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>Study of Sina Weibo and comparison with Twitter</minidescription>
 <description>There has been a tremendous rise in the growth of online social networks all over the world in recent times. While some networks like Twitter and Facebook have been well documented, the popular Chinese microblogging social network Sina Weibo has not been studied. In this work, we examine the key topics that trend on Sina Weibo and contrast them with our observations on Twitter. We find that there is a
vast difference in the content shared in China, when compared to a global social network such as Twitter. In China, the trends are created almost entirely due to retweets of media content such as jokes, images and videos, whereas on Twitter, the trends tend to have more to do with current global events and news stories.</description>
 <author>Louis Yu, Sitaram Asur, Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>14 Jul 2011 11:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>social computing</tag>
  <tag>trends</tag>
  <tag>twitter</tag>
 </tags>
</item>

<item>
 <title>Rankr: A Mobile System for Crowdsourcing Opinions</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/rankr/rankr.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>Make pairwise comparisons that are aggregated into a ranked list via a mobile device</minidescription>
 <description>Evaluating large sets of items, be they business ideas, priorities or agile feature requests, is a difficult task. But while no one person has time to evaluate all the items, many people can contribute by each evaluating a few. Moreover, given the mobility of people, it is useful to allow them to evaluate items from their mobile devices. We present the design, implementation and evaluation of a new mobile service, Rankr, which provides a lightweight and efficient way to crowdsource the relative ranking of ideas, photos, music, or priorities through a series of pairwise comparisons. Through a usability test, we discover that users are willing to sacrifice fidelity in order to have two items displayed at the same time on their mobile devices. From an algorithm standpoint, given the votes that others have already cast, Rankr automatically determines the next most useful pair of candidates a user can evaluate to maximize the information gained while minimizing the number of votes required.  Unlike typical rank voting methods, voters do not need to compare and manually rank all of the candidates.</description>
 <author>Yarun Luon, Christina Aperjis, Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>13 Jun 2011 11:45:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>social computing</tag>
  <tag>ranking</tag>
  <tag>rankr</tag>
  <tag>mobility</tag>
  <tag>crowdsourcing</tag>
  <tag>incentives</tag>
  <tag>user interfaces</tag>
 </tags>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Sunk Cost Fallacy in Reverse Auctions</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/sunkcost/RACsunkcost.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>A simple probabilistic model describes how buyers select bids in reverse auctions</minidescription>
 <description>We empirically study buyer behavior in an online outsourcing website where sealed bid auctions are held with bids arriving over time. We focus on when buyers terminate their requests and how they behave when choosing the winning
bid. We find that buyers tend to choose any bid prior to the last one with the approximately the same frequency, whereas they are more likely to choose the last bid. We provide a simple probabilistic model that captures this behavior. The key characteristic of this model is that buyers are more likely to stop when the most recent bid is the best so far. This feature is related to the sunk cost fallacy: once a buyer has waited for some time, she has an escalating tendency to continue waiting until a bid that is better than all prior bids
arrives. A buyer is unwilling to recall early bids, because that would make her perceive the time since the arrival of early bids as wasted, even though the time cost has already been incurred at the time of the decision.                        </description>
 <author>Yu Wu, Hang Ung, and Christina Aperjis</author>
 <pubDate>04 Apr 2011 10:55:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>sunk cost fallacy</tag>
  <tag>auctions</tag>
  <tag>electronic commerce</tag>
  <tag>online communities</tag>
  <tag>social computing</tag>
 </tags>
</item>


<item>
	<title>Trends in Social Media : Persistence and Decay</title>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/trends/trends_web.pdf</link>
	<minidescription>Study how trends on Twitter are formed and propagate</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>social trends</tag>
	  <tag>social media</tag>
	  <tag>public agenda</tag>
          <tag>twitter</tag>
  </tags> 
	<description>Social media generates a prodigious wealth of real-time content at an incessant rate. From all the content that 
people create and share, only a few topics manage to attract enough attention to rise to the top and become temporal trends which are displayed to users. The question of what factors cause the formation and persistence of trends is an important one that has not been answered yet. In this paper, we conduct an intensive study of trending topics on Twitter and provide a theoretical basis for the formation, persistence and decay of trends. We also demonstrate empirically
how factors such as user activity and number of followers do not contribute strongly to trend creation and its propagation. In fact, we find that the resonance of the content with the users of the social network plays a major role in causing trends. </description>
	<author>Sitaram Asur, Bernardo A. Huberman, Gabor Szabo and Chunyan Wang</author>
	<pubDate>04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>